![]() Her computer was slow compare to today's standard which made it really difficult. I was doing some major repair for a family friend and i couldn't tell if the system was hanging or working. I also felt an 100% progress bar should be implemented like when scanning the registry. (sorry for the blunt, but we are here cause this is the best program, not junk code). Sure it's less pretty, but we are here for something that does a job good and clean not all pretty and half working. This is more usefull than the duh progress bar you have now, and less bloaty than any other graphical option. I say leave a true progress out, dump the existing progress bar, and add a text field with say "delete file progress 5%" "delete registry progress 30%" and update the text as appropriate. That said, I like to have an idea if I have 5 minutes left or 5 hours - so I want a real working progress bar.Ĭost / benefit wise I prefer to have a tiny clean sharp exe that does the job with no bloat - progress bars almost always bloat the code to ridiculous levels. and then make your progress bar behave realistically (progress bars that show nothing but file work ok, you mix file and memory and the progress bar jumps and stalls). Programattically it is almost impossible to ballpark file i/o time + registry i/o time +. Life is tough sometimes.Īs a programmer I can help defend the code writer, and both request the feature and request it NOT be implimented. However, sometimes even that isn't good enough because plenty of times when something is being scanned it will stop on a particular file and stay there for several mins. ![]() I guess the only way to truly make everyone happy would be to show the files it's working through. The reason is that I hate when a progress bar doesn't move for quite some time because it's working on something, ie, malware scanner, because you're not sure if the program malfuntioned. I wouldn't feel as comfortable if it were a progress bar instead of a staus bar as indicated by Caldor). For example, when I install it on a friend's computer that's a virgin to CCleaner, it takes quite a bit of time to finish because there's so much crap on it, but I know it's working. ![]() Thanks for listening and thanks again for this very very useful program.īelieve it or not, I actually like the present configuration for the "progress bar." I like this better because each time it starts over I know that the program is working and that there is a quite a bit of crap left to clean and the program isn't locking-up. At least there won't be any more mirages to get annoyed at. If this is not possible, then please please please scrap the progress bars and just put a 'please wait' message. ie what progress bars are supposed to tell you. So, just in case i'm not being clear, i would love to know how long the analysis is going to take in terms of a rough percentage of how much its got thru at any point. This is really the only thing wrong with this wonderful program, i just thought i'd point out the obvious-to-me-but-it-seems-no-one-else. you can see progress bars, but its not telling you the progress !!! The user has no idea how many times this is going to happen, so in effect, the 'progress' bars as they are in CCleaner right now are actually mirages. A progress bar is supposed to tell the user how much time is remaining but the way its implemented when performing an analysis in CCleaner, the progress bar gets to the end and then starts again.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |